Is Gary Bettman Waiting For Another Team To Collapse For Quebec?

There is no current news about a Quebec expansion team but that does not mean nothing significant is happening. First a brief recap.

Forget the nonsense of the official NHL story that the Quebecor bid was turned down because of conference imbalance and a low Canadian dollar. The real reason Quebec still does not have the Nordiques back is because the owner of Quebecor, Pierre Karl Peladeau made a lot of enemies on the NHL Board, first because he is a known supporter of the separatist provincial party, Parti Quebecois, and more specifically he publicly insulted a member of the Board, Montreal Canadiens owner Geoff Molson about his suitability in owning the team because he is an anglophone Quebecer. Peladeau never retracted his remarks or apologized to Molson and that made it easy for Gary Bettman and the NHL to turn down Quebecor’s bid long before construction started on the new Videotron arena. The recent election of Molson to the NHL Executive Committee confirms that Bettman and the Board were backing him to the hilt. The NHL cannot afford to have a public racist on its Board and acted accordingly.

That did not solve the problem of Quebec. In 2010 Gary Bettman offered terms of readmission to all three ex-NHL cities that lost their franchises, Quebec, Winnipeg, and Hartford. He publicly consorted with the Quebec Provincial Premier, the Quebec City mayor and other important businessmen and government officials and kept encouraging them to spend nearly $400 million taxpayer dollars on a new arena. Probably privately he told the premier and the mayor that Peladeau was an unsuitable owner but to keep building the arena while he handled the ownership problem.


Finding a suitable owner meant that Gary Bettman would work behind the scenes as much as possible so it is difficult to know what is going on. I have speculated that the resignation of Patrick Roy from the Colorado Avalanche may be part of an attempt to put a suitable ownership group together.

Part of the problem is that there may not be enough rich French Canadians who want to own an NHL franchise. Another solution would be to accept outside help but Americans, investors from “English Canada” might fear an elected Parti Quebecois provincial government and have stayed away from investing in Quebec.

There is another possible solution. Like the Atlanta crisis a few years ago, Bettman and the Board may know about certain members of the Board who find their current cities unsuitable and would welcome a move to Quebec which is the coming city in Canada, soon, maybe within a decade to have over 1 million residents.


There would be no problem in attracting sell-out crowds, attracting corporate sponsors, and selling Quebec Nordiques merchandise for a Quebec team. The market includes all of eastern Quebec province and the four Maritime provinces. Take away the racial and political problems, Quebec with a new arena is a marvelous investment opportunity, one of the better NHL franchises, a sure winner. Adding the city would restore the Quebec-Montreal rivalry, once the best in the NHL, allow Bettman to keep his promise, and get many of his Canadian critics off his back.

The only real drawback to Quebec getting an established NHL franchise instead of an expansion team is that the NHL would have to forgo that $500 million expansion fee. But in compensation, a current weak franchise would become an instant strong one. And the NHL could still get its $500 million by expanding to another western city instead which would allow the league to realign as well.

So if Quebec is to get its team by a franchise shift instead of expansion, who are the candidates? One of the most obvious ones, Arizona will not be moved because it will cause further conference imbalance. If the Coyotes move, they will be moved to a western city.

So the shifted franchise will come from the Eastern Conference. Based on current NHL attendance, the top choices can all said to be the “usuals”

1. Carolina Hurricanes

They have the worst attendance in the NHL and the owner, Peter Karmanos is known to want to sell. Currently the Hurricanes are drawing approximately 60% arena capacity, by far the worst in the NHL. The reasons for not moving the team are that the Hurricanes have won the Stanley Cup so there is some kind of tradition. And the reason for poor attendance might be because the Hurricanes have not iced a contending team for a long time. But if they added a star player and contended again, would the fans come back? Still they are considered the number one target.

2. New York Islanders

They have been treated like poor cousins of the New York Rangers for years. Despite the heritage of winning four Stanley Cups in a row, a feat that has only been accomplished twice before, the Islanders have been treated shabbily since their glory days. Nothing was done to replace their outmoded arena with a new, larger, modern one. Currently the Islanders play in probably the worst arena in the NHL, the Barclay’s Center in Brooklyn which is far from their original fan base, is the second smallest arena in the league, and has lots of obstructive view seats. A few years ago, a large delegation of Quebec fans came down en masse and bought a large quantity of unsold Islander tickets to show the NHL they were in earnest to get the Nordiques back. The Islanders are a target all right. But moving this franchise would be a tremendous blow and loss of status to the NHL in the United States because of the Islanders history and heritage. And it is said that yet another new arena might be built in Queens. That would be the preferred solution for the NHL.

3. Columbus Blue Jackets

It is one thing to move the Hurricanes and Islanders but there would be no problem in moving the inglorious Blue Jackets who have only made the playoffs twice in 16 years and have never won a playoff round. The Blue Jackets try to get fans from a cursed hockey area in the United States, Ohio-Indiana which I have labeled the “Death Valley” of American hockey. Nobody can explain why in an area so close to the Canadian border and between such hockey loving cities like Pittsburgh and Buffalo in the east and Minnesota, Chicago and Detroit in the west, hockey is so unpopular. In these two states are buried the dead bodies of the Indianapolis Racers, Cincinnati Stingers, Cleveland Crusaders, and Cleveland Barons, all from the 1970s. As mentioned in an earlier article, the NHL can never forget the horrible attendance of the ghost of the Cleveland Barons. That is why when NHL expansion is talked about, these cities are never mentioned. Columbus is simply the most successful team ever to inhabit these states. But they average just over 15,000 fans per game which is only 82% arena capacity. If the wonderful turnaround of the current season still does not attract fans, maybe the owners will conclude that it is time to move to Quebec where they will be appreciated.

4. Florida Panthers

Florida ranks with inglorious Columbus. They made the Stanley Cup Final once, two decades ago. Since then they seldom make the playoffs. Gary Bettman had great difficulty finding new owners for the team a few years ago. The new ownership has made the team playoff contenders but they still only get 85% arena capacity for their games. Leaving the reluctant Miami market for Quebec is a real option for the Panthers.

5. New Jersey Devils

The Devils are the other poor relations of the New York Rangers. Like the Islanders they have a winning heritage with three Stanley Cups, but mostly they are a hockey after-thought after the Rangers and Islanders. They average 14.5 thousand fans which is 88% capacity. But moving the team is ugly for the NHL because of their past success and heritage. Perhaps moving to another part of New Jersey, away from the New York area where they can find fans that will really identify with the team is the best solution.

Is this the real plan of Gary Bettman and the NHL Board? Do the same thing as in the Atlanta crisis? Wait until the current season ends and then shift an existing franchise to Canada. That would be a suitable gift for Canada’s Sesquicentennial.

4 thoughts on “Is Gary Bettman Waiting For Another Team To Collapse For Quebec?

  1. Hi Ericthephantom,
    Thanks for your great informative sharing which gives us more idea no doubt about it. I have gathered knowledge every single bullet point from your article, Please keep it up for us regularly. Thanks !

    • Thanks for responding, azonoutbust. I’d like to see Quebec get its team back and a Hamilton franchise too. Like I said in my article, Quebec City with a suitable owner and proper arena is a can’t miss franchise. There main sticking point for either expansion or relocation is racism. For expansion it is personified in the person of Peladeau who has made enemies on the NHL Board and has not reconciled with them. His politics and his business sense are completely absurd. He wants to be on the NHL Board yet he publicly insults one of its members (remarks that probably offended other Board members too) and tries to obstruct the dealings of one this man’s business colleagues. He claims that he is a “separatist” but then has his company buy the Sun Media chain giving him employees whom he is responsible for right across Canada. Now he probably has to speak partly in English every day and if the Parti Quebecois whom he supports manages to get Quebec out of Canada, his profits could take a nose dive. On the basis of his unpredictability alone, the NHL will not trust him. Nor can any separatist voter. The NHL wants to keep away from him.

      As far as relocation is concerned, racism is again unfortunately the main block. Any English speaking franchise owner, Canadian or American contemplating a franchise shift is going to hesitate about moving to Quebec because they fear a Parti Quebecois or similar party Quebec Provincial government backed by French Canadian racists passing legislation making it impossible to own and run a team by an “outsider”. There are other racial issues. Will Quebecers accept an owner who cannot speak a word of French? Will Quebec City, hitherto a mostly French speaking homogenous city tolerate the possibility of minority ethnic communities within its boundaries like Montreal? By getting back the Nordiques, Quebec will be opening itself up to all these possibilities; it will have its own “Westmount”, “Little Italy”, “Chinatown”, etc.

      It is sad that Quebec is being blocked by racism. Especially now that Quebec has officially over 800,000 residents, it is a great market to put a team in. But even back in 1995 when the Nordiques moved, Quebec was a great franchise, getting consistently sold out crowds. But no French Canadian owner appeared to save the team or build a new arena. And for the reasons listed above, no outside investor would come either. Ottawa and Winnipeg for example are owned by non-residents. Take away the racial/political issue and it is quite conceivable that Quebec would not have lost its team at all, being owned by an non-French speaking investor from outside the province, and a new arena could have been built without a single taxpayer dollar being spent. But the French Canadian separatists scare away investors from other parts of Canada and the United States.

      There have been new developments about relocation since I wrote this article in January. If the New York Islanders move, it will be to Hartford and a returned Whalers. Money has been voted to renovate the XL Center and they have made an unofficial, formal pitch for the Islanders to come. So you can cross them off your list. And now that the New Jersey Devils have got the first pick in the NHL draft, it is doubtful they would leave. My choice would be either be Florida or Columbus. But Columbus is hoping that their achievements this year will finally bring sellout crowds. Carolina is still a prime target, but I hate to move a Stanley Cup winner. And the team is obviously improving. Perhaps with a good draft choice and improved play next year, the fans will come back. The obvious team to move, the Arizona Coyotes are in the west and moving them will cause further league imbalance. Phoenix and the Arizona legislature are probably going to refuse financial assistance and Bettman has publicly stated that the Coyotes are finished in Glendale. So where will they go? If no western city like Seattle, Portland, Houston, etc. will come to the rescue, Quebec may be their only hope or else they will have to fold the team. Quebec will get a team somehow, but when and how I cannot say.

      • Thanks for responding Devils fan. I doubt that the Devils will be moving, at least right now. The NHL has more serious problems with Arizona, the New York Islanders, Carolina, and Columbus than with the Devils. Nevertheless, attendance for the Devils is one of the low spots for the NHL, unless they make the playoffs and do well. There is always talk about a possible move. Maybe like you say, getting a high draft choice will capture the interest of the fans and increase attendance.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s